Fermentation quality of dwarf napiergrass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach) was estimated\nfor additives lactic acid bacteria and Acremonium cellulase (LAB + AC), fermented juice of epiphytic\nlactic acid bacteria (FJLB), and a no-additive control in 2006 via two ensiling methodsââ?¬â?round-bale\nand vinyl-bag methods in 2006ââ?¬â?and via two ensiling seasonsââ?¬â?summer and autumn of 2013.\nFermentation quality of dwarf napiergrass ensiled in the summer season was improved by the\ninput of additives, with the highest quality in LAB + AC, followed by FJLB; the lactic acid content\nwas higher, and the pH and sum of the butyric, caproic, and valeric acid contents were lower,\nresulting in an increase in the V-score value by each additive. The ensiling method in autumn\nwithout additives affected fermentation quality, mainly due to the airtightness, which was higher for\nround-bale processing than in vinyl bags, even with the satisfactory V-score of 72. Fermentation in\nround bales without additives had a higher quality in autumn than in summer, possibly due to the\nhigher concentration of mono- and oligo-saccharides. Thus, it was concluded that dwarf napiergrass\ncan be produced to satisfactory-quality silage by adding LAB + AC or FJLB in summer and even in\nthe absence of additives in autumn.
Loading....